Created by: Kaitlyn Kanarowski, John Mahaffey, Tim Ford, Reese Ward, and Tim Kirby
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
Background
Guns are not the problem, people are. The government has
tried to implement multiple laws regarding guns to decrease the amount of gun
violence, but many laws were later considered unconstitutional specifically,
the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1994. The Brady Handgun Act tried
to enforce a waiting period in order to obtain a handgun and also required
background checks on purchasers of handguns. On the other hand, some laws
passed years ago still hold true today including the Gun Control Act of 1968.
The Gun Control Act, which was a result of John F. Kennedy’s assassination,
prohibited mail order sales of rifles and shotguns, increased license
requirements that prohibited convicted felons, drug users and mentally
incompetent people to own a gun. Chicago is known to have strict gun control
laws, but the gun violence in Chicago has not significantly due to the laws.
Because the massacres that have affected Americans all over the world, what
makes making stricter laws now any different than the laws enforce years
before? Strengthening laws concerning gun control laws have not solved the
problem in the past and history has proved it, therefore, it will most likely
be more beneficial to continue with the current laws rather than promoting new
ones today.
Statistics/examples: The Truth
The government is trying to seek publicity when attempting
to promote stricter laws; they are not necessarily trying to help us decrease
the amount of violence. According to an online website, statistics show that a
majority of people want only to continue the existing laws because we all know
that creating more laws will not only infringe on our rights as citizens, but
also not be beneficial to us, therefore, there is nothing good that comes out
of enforcing new gun control laws. For example, Chicago has had strict laws
regarding gun control laws for years and there continues to be high levels of
gun violence within Chicago. The second amendment states that every citizen has
the right to own a gun for protection, and we should not be stripped of that
right because of the government’s attempt to have too much power. Ultimately,
the statistics do not support actions of the government, and history as proved
it.
Effects on people
In Maryland, a well-spoken fifteen-year-old girl speaks up
on her position regarding gun control laws and what limiting gun control laws
would do to her as a teenager and to the everyday citizen. She is a rifle
student who has received scholarships that allows her to attend college. She
gives statistics about the Chicago violence verses the Iraq violence as well as
giving us insight of other ways violence will continue. She is a strong
believer in guns not being the problem, the people are. Ultimately, she is
against the legislation regarding gun control laws to protect the citizens from
their constitutional rights.
3D Printer
3D
printers are a thing of the future or I guess you can say of the present. 3D
printers are printers that make a three-dimensional solid object, they start
creating the objects layer by layer and eventually the object you wanted
printed becomes real, this process is called additive manufacturing. For the printer to work you need to have an
.stl file then after the printer reads the file it starts to make the object
with layers of liquid, powder, and or sheet material to create the model sheets
then these sheets are automatically fused to create the final shape. It
determines the thickness of the sheets of material by something called dpi
which is dots per inch the normal thickness is about 100 micrometers or 0.1 mm.
Depending on the type of 3D printer you have it can take from several hours to
days it all just depends on how many how complex the object is and how many you
are trying to create. 3D printers have been around for a very long time they
may have not been very effect but in the 1970’s there were a hand full of 3D
printers that were very large and very limited to what they could create. There are even some companies that offer
on-line 3D printing to customers all they have to do is up load their desired
objects 3D design to the company’s
website and wait for what you have ordered. They are talking about in the
future being able to recreate things like fossils and artifacts. Could you
image??
Why 3D Printers are Important
The printers themselves are not limited on what they can print. Given enough time working with the design program and a person could design almost anything. A person could also design a gun. This has already been done by several people. Since the guns are printed and fused together they do not last long. Some people refer to these printed guns a "disposable gun" because after only a few shots (ten or less in some cases) the gun will be rendered useless. This is due to extreme forces from the ammunition and the non durable material construction of the gun. The guns cannot be repaired either. Some people see this as a cheep alternative to buying a gun. Since these guns are not manufactured by a company and the designs can be modified by any person with the file and a computer, the printed guns cant be regulated by the government. Therefore they are not governed by the gun control laws and anyone can have them. This is just another way that shows how in effective gun control laws are.
Options
The idea of gun control is something that relates to
everyone in some form or fashion. It also means many people have their own
ideas for gun control. The debate over how to approach gun control laws is an
on-going debate between lawmakers in congress and average citizens alike. Some
groups would like to have laws that completely banned guns for everyone. They
feel that this would help to reduce the violence that is done using guns as the
weapon of choice. On the opposite side of the subject is the idea of having no
gun control whatsoever. If there were to be no gun control laws, everyone would
obviously have equal access to guns. Some people feel that this freedom would
allow people to use their weapon more responsibly. Also since the great
availability of guns, there would possibly be less violence because everyone
would be protected by a gun. In the middle of these two greatly different ideas
is where our country is currently located in this battle. It is the idea of not
changing our current gun laws. If gun laws are changed, many people feel it
infringes of their second amendment rights. Other people feel without the addition
of new laws, gun violence and mass murders will continue on a fast,
uncontrollable track. This is why the current debate on guns is so popular. It
affects everyone now and in the future. Many people want to continue the debate
to make their own respective viewpoint’s side happy. We as a WRD 111 group have
a better option than the three mentioned above.
Group option
Our arguments purpose is to try and eliminate change from
our Second Amendment. Currently, the government is trying to do so by placing
gun laws in every aspect. We want the citizens to keep their Rights and create
a middle ground for both the government and our benefits. Changing of the
‘Right to Bear Arms’ will cause an uproar within our society. With this, it is
known as only benefiting the government and not the population. Thus, defeating
the purpose of our so-called Democracy (For the people, by the people).
By
performing a background check, we can prevent guns ending up in the wrong hands
of people who wish to hurt others. This should be in tact for purchase of every
piece of firearm, such as ammunition.
Call to action
Firearms in America need to be a little more maintained.
There are steps that we Americans should take to lessen the impact of gun
violence on society. Small things like petitions could stir the
people together and convince the government that some things need to change.
From:< http://mhutch.blogspot.com>
It is
important to make sure that this issue doesn’t fade away so that things may be
changed now. Limiting what people get can help our nation progress towards a
good future. Currently, people are pushing towards an assault rifle ban for
America. An assault rifle ban is a good
step in that it is the primary weapon that was used in the recent mass
shooting. There is also bans on how much people can carry in magazines.
However, we should push for more bans should progressively follow this one. For
example, a handgun ban should come soon considering it is the number one cause
of death in America by a firearm as shown by the chart below.
From:< http://mhutch.blogspot.com>
We the people need to unite to stop gun violence. Doing
things like rallies or signing petitions can get our voice and opinions heard.
Pressing for more restrictions is the only way to go considering a complete ban
on weapons is virtually impossible because of the people against it. If more
people can join the fight for gun control, then are voices can and will be
heard by the government.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



